Week 4 Post #4

Humanism in the Renaissance 

3D view of the Sistine Chapel

http://www.vatican.va/various/cappelle/sistina_vr/index.html

The influence and impact of humanism on renaissance art can be seen in famous works from the entirety of Leonardo Da Vinci's works, to even more religious based and religious inspired works. For this journal entry I'd like to focus on some works by Michelangelo, because I feel as if his works (while some being religious in nature) are the best example of humanistic influence in the High Renaissance Period.    

The most prevalent example of his humanistic works would be "David" (a lifelike sculpture of a human man). This sculpture is an accurate portrayal of a man as he is. There is no artistic reinterpretation, just the solid legitimate attempt to capture David as accurately as possible. Everything from the muscle structure to the genitalia, to the facial features, shows his focus on creating it as naturalistic and humanistic as possible. This is in comparison to the version of "David" done by Donatello in the early renaissance, where the artist took a lot more stylistic approaches when creating his version of "David". One major difference that can be seen in Michelangelo's version compared to Donatello's, is the amount of detail on the hair, thighs, legs, and feet. 

Moving on, I'm going to be talking about how Michelangelo's work at the Sistine Chapel was influenced by humanism as well. The painting that I'm going to be focusing on is "The creation of Adam". I chose this painting because the most common interpretation is of God reaching out towards man. If a deeply religious painting such as this one is done in a humanistic style, that would attest to the influence that said style had on the High Renaissance Period. 

The humanistic aspect of this painting can be easily deduced by the fact that neither of the men depicted in "The creation of Adam" are portrayed in a divine manner. Instead it can actually be argued that this is an old man trying to reach out to his younger self. They're both very human, and neither have the early renaissance characteristic of a golden halo surrounding their heads. It also confuses me as to why if this image was truly of "God" why then would he need to be carried by his angels? If this is truly a depiction of God reaching out to man, then why would he be reaching further and more fervently than the man reclining on the mountain? It would almost seem as if the old man is the spirit of the younger man (carried by all his successes and accomplishments) reaching out to his younger self. However knowing how much Michelangelo hated this project, and how focused he was in his endeavor to capture the essence of humanity,  its more likely that this  painting portrays an old man carried by his desires yearning to be alive once again. By doing so this would appear to be a painting reflecting the deepest desire of all humanity: Eternal Youth. 

I believe that by looking more deeply into the works of artists in the High Renaissance Period you will find that even the most fervently religious ones had their works influenced by the humanistic movement.

Week 3, Post #3

Early Italian Renaissance Art

Formal Analysis

The Birth Of Venus

by Sandro Botticelli

For my formal analysis I decided to choose "The Birth Of Venus" as my painting of choice from the Early Renaissance period. this painting is a great example of how artists would create art in this generation because it has many of the techniques we see compiled into one image. In my formal analysis I will be discussing these techniques and really going over what we see in this painting.

            One of the first things I noticed when looking at this painting, (as i'm sure is the same thing countless others first notice) Is the naked Venus standing almost perfectly in the center, in a contraposto pose in a shell. At this point, most of these features of the Venus woman and the shell are decently realistic for the time, and appear to be very naturalistic in my opinion. Both are fine examples of techniques and subject matter that are popular during this era. another thing to be noted, is the horizon line. Its location in the image is slightly high, but it creates what appears to be atmospheric perspective because of how the land closest to the viewer is almost black with how dark it is, but in the farthest area closest to the horizon line it is the lightest. This can also be seen with how the water was painted as well as the sky.

            Another example of popular things from this period we can see in this work, is the many use of triangles in this painting's composition. the first one we see is created with the figure of Venus, and the woman's arms throwing clothing over her. her arms create the tip of the triangle while the figure of Venus is the base. another triangle I found in this image is from Venus's eyes, lowest hand, and the eyes of the two figures on the left. These two triangles alone create enough movement throughout the entire piece that The artist could have left it at two, but after looking at this work for awhile longer, found another triangle formed by Venus again, her head is the tip of the triangle, while the shell forms the base for what makes a third triangle. Those were just the triangles created out of figures of things supposedly there. On top of those, there are at least 3 other triangles formed from the negative space around the figures, and even more created from the land jutting out into the sea and back to land.

            There is also a mix of naturalism and illusionism in this painting and even some stylization is mixed in. The artist used naturalism when creating the people (with what they had ability wise for the era) and the clothing. Every fold and crease is easily seen and thus can be identifiable with as natural and real. all these elements mixed together create a very naturalistic feel; they even tried to get foreshortening with an illusionism feel from the shell that Venus stands on. it almost seems to be coming towards us with the way it is painted on its back. However on top of all these elements is the very stylized water that seems slightly out of place when looking at the overall amount of detail, naturalism and illusionism in this painting. So why would the artist throw it into the painting instead of just painting the water like what we would see in the natural world? maybe because it was a popular style back then to have stylization in opposition to naturalism in the early Renaissance era.

            Overall I believe this work of art to be a very influential and beautiful piece of Early renaissance art, and it very easily shows examples of most all the techniques found to be popular in this era; as well as seemingly opening doors to more realistic and influential paintings in its era and ours. paintings like this one stay with us for a long time. we remember them because they touch a spark in us that we don't feel through most modern means anymore. Even though this painting was painted with tempera and gold on canvas instead of as a fresco painting, we still hold it in a high regard for its importance in its generation. 

Week 2, Post #2

Intro  to  Northern  Renaissance  Art

Considered the great "century of change" the northern Renaissance consists of a new way of painting, which started an "image revolution." (quotes taken from the northern renaissance documentary) This Image revolution was important because it reflected new ideas and concepts of how to look at art and how to create art that had never been seen before. By creating an image using only oil paints and still creating an image that seems so real the audience can relate to the people in the images and feel as if they are looking through a window into another world. This idea of ultra realism was so different from the idea of worth and value of jewels, gold and silver in art that it became its own genera of worth and in some ways are worth more than those that used gold, silver and jewels in their creations. 

For example, Jan Van Eyck the creator of the Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife, (pictured above) is a very important image and it still astonishes viewers to this day. Other images such as some of his alter pieces that show insanely realistic images of gold, silver, and jewels of many kinds are so realistic and breathtaking that they appear to be actual gold, silver, and jewels. He did this by only using oil paint instead of pasting actual gems to his work. The artists who used this method didn't affect its audience as profoundly as Jan Van Eyck did. because their piece wasn't a fluid surface, you could tell that the light and shadows that affected the gems on the art didn't match what was depicted underneath. 

Also during this time period works of art used in churches and of biblical figures were very important to the culture at the time. This is because Catholics and Christians at the time believed that one could become close to the figures in religion by visualizing themselves worshiping them or by putting themselves into the happenings of the characters painted. so thus the more realistic the image was the easier it was for people to do this. This is also why there are so many depictions of Joseph and Mary in 14th century houses and clothing. They believed the story stayed the same but just the environments changed.  

 

To the average viewer now, this may not make any sense. But back then it was just an everyday thing. The art styles as well we can see as a little strange, how they used to paint men so real to life; in some instances it appeared as if there was blood pulsing underneath the painted flesh. While women were usually depicted appearing more like dolls and were more impressionistic to what the general accepted look of a woman should be. Their presence in an otherwise all together realistic image confuses me. You think, well if they can make all these other things look this realistic, including the male figures, why not then make the women fit better into this created environment?

However this just seems to be the norm with northern renaissance pictures and thus will probably stay a mystery. But on the other hand its so beautiful in its depiction It doesn't seem to be as big of a question as other things would be. It would more likely be a better use of time to figure out all the iconography in all the different paintings of the time, and try to figure them out that way.

New Quarter, New Old Art!

Post #1 

Week #1

Introduction To  Renaissance  Art

In this quarter, we will be discussing renaissance art, and looking at many different works by different artists. But what is it about Renaissance art that sparks a light in our souls? Why does it resonate so fully within our hearts? Why do people still hold it in such a high regard now, with all of our technology and modern artists? It awakens a stirring inside of us, that can be felt again and again as we gaze upon the beauty that was created during this time period. But why is this so? Why do we hold this art in such high regard?  Why does our breath catch every time we gaze a work of art created during this era? What did Leonardo da Vinci, Raphael, and Michelangelo know that made their art so amazing? And not only was their art amazing, they created so much of it during each of their lifetimes, proving that their ability was greater than any we can imagine. Already at the beginning of the quarter, so many questions are rattling around in my head. Alas I can only speculate and research, but most of these questions may never be answered by anyone but the artist themselves... 

Even to the average viewer, one with no artistic ability of their own, can look at a work like the Mona Lisa, or the Sistine chapel and stare at it astounded at the simple beauty that resides in the semi-realistic style of those time periods. We can even duplicate and mass produce these famous paintings, turn them into skins for our cell phones and stitch them into purses and bags. But why this time period? What is so special about it? Perhaps the answer lies in the fine soft features created from oils on wood, or the powerful contrast of colors; or even an accurate representation of light and spacial elements that seem so realistic that if only we could reach out into the painting, perhaps we could join another world long since past. What woman wouldn't want a man with the physique of the statue of David?  Who wouldn't look at the mirror in A Double Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and His Wife and marvel at the accurate portrayal of a mirror and eye for the details that surround it? 

With the growth of technology in our generation, as well as the invention of photography and the change in societies level of importance from art to sports; Hundreds of years of knowledge about art techniques and training to reach that point have been lost to the wind. Which is why I believe the Art of the Renaissance period is looked upon as so marvelous and awe inspiring; because with all our technology and advancements we still lack the ability to recreate works such as the Mona Lisa, the Sistine Chapel, and The statue of David.  And this reason is among some of the main reasons I so look forward to taking this class as well. 

My name is Kelsee Franz, and I love art. 

January 6, 2012 

Post #9

End of the quarter, a look back on what I learned. 

Post #9 

I enjoyed all of the art we went over this quarter, albeit I admit, it was more interesting when we got to the ancient Egypt and ancient roman art; but I'm biased anyway when it comes to those genres of history. It was also fascinating because around the same time that we were getting into the ancient Greek and ancient Roman art periods, my big sister actually went on a cruise throughout Europe and took a ton of pictures of the things that we were looking at. Such as the Pantheon, and the Parthenon, the Colosseum; she got a ton of pictures of things we didn't go over as well, such as the Sistine chapel, the leaning tower of Pisa, and many others that she couldn't tell me exactly what they were since she had forgotten.but that's another story, and I hope to go over them next quarter.

The depth of the emotions in some of the art pieces we went over, especially the ultra realistic marble statues struck a chord in my soul and I truly felt connected to. I think i was drawn to these periods in history, because its around the same time that Christianity came into being; and its always interesting to see and think about the world before it was now. Some of the creations that ancient civilizations came up with in that time period are astounding even today; some even stump architects today on how they were able to create them. (the Pyramids) I hold intelligence to a higher standard than most, and I always find it amusing to seriously contemplate how things were created and built; along with the minds that created them. I also loved how even though I thought I knew a lot about ancient Egyptian culture, and history, I didn't know that the pyramids used to be white with a golden tip. That was the most awe inspiring thing I learned about a culture that I find fascinating. And it will be a piece of knowledge that I can share with many people I talk to about such wonders.

The image of the pyramids of Giza in the morning light, shining with such purity and grace... I cant even begin to describe how awe inspired this image makes me. It also makes me want to go out into the world and see works of amazement in all the cultures... I want to see it all. I think that will be one of my life's goals to do before I settle down into the simple life I want in the future. I would love to see the other structures that the ancient Egyptians were able to create as well as the art and ruins they left behind. There is something fascinating about the same art style surviving and being popular for thousands of years that confuses me. were there no artists who thought outside the 3000 year old box during that time period? if there were, how were they treated in that society? fascinating, fascinating stuff.

Another piece that inspired me to take another look at art and re-evaluate where my art is taking me is this one, the Portrait head of Caracalla. even though it is partially destroyed, we still get a sense of what the artist was going for, with the raw emotion that he displays plainly on his face. I find this refreshing since I've been dealing with lack of emotion in my art, or rather a fear of painting anything with a realistic expressionism to it. The Romans never shy away from displaying such emotions plainly in their art, and that inspires me to care less as to the feelings of my audience and instead paint what comes from my soul. So thank you ancient Romans! Its too bad your society ended up getting so corrupted it destroyed itself! :-D

Week 9 Post #8

Option #2 

Compare and contrast 

Fall of Adam and Eve- The crucifixion of Christ

(Third panel down from the top)

I chose to compare the Fall of Adam and Eve with the Crucifixion of Christ, because these two happenings are not only common knowledge for Christians, but also common knowledge of everyone who has access to civilization. These two images relate to one another more than they differ, as they both share a common theme of change in the Bible.

For example, in the first example we see a depiction of the story of Adam and Eve, which is entirely straight forward. Along with this imagery we can imagine instantly the full story, of Eve being tempted by Satan in the form of a snake, to disobey God and eat from the forbidden fruit tree which would make man like God, with the knowledge of God. This is why Eve is covering herself while offering the fruit to Adam. Since the fruit made her realize she was naked, and thus ashamed of herself. This story is the starting point of man, or rather, the starting point of sin on earth. This is why there is sin in the world today.

In comparison, the story of the crucifixion of Christ is another important story of the Bible; not only because the Son of God came to earth to save us, but because of the erasing of the sin inside of us when we believe in Him, and accept Him. This is an extremely important aspect of the bible because the entire human race was changed the day He rose again. Not only because it introduced Christianity to the world, but because it saved us from sin. Thus in a way, it is the end of sin; not because sin no longer existed after the crucifixion of Christ, but because of the ability to rid ourselves of sin without having to sacrifice something in place of the sin that we commit. Instead Jesus did that for us-which is depicted here.

Both of these images represent something truly important, so it focuses on both aspects without many other distracting details or frills. Jesus is in the direct center on the right, and he is the biggest and most prominent person on that square. Whereas on the left scene of Adam and Eve, the apple is in the center, and even though there are two people in this image, your eye goes directly to that apple. It represents Sin, and because of that, is the most important thing in this image.  The arms of the figures help the eye to follow the apple to Adam, and then back around to Eve in a full rotation of the composition. Looking back on the crucifixion of Christ, there are four figures around Jesus. A guard on the left, testing his corpse to see if he is truly dead, John the Baptist on the left, another guard offering Jesus some sort of liquid, perhaps vinegar (if memory serves me correctly), and the Virgin Mary on the right.

I was also curious about the placement of these panels, because of their importance to Christianity, why they would not be placed at the top. It’s also interesting to see that there were three panels on the left depicting Adam and eve, even though in our modern outlook, we usually just focus on the fall of Adam and Eve instead of the creation of them. But looking further at this composition it seems relevant to point out that these panels are three down from the top, and in the Bible it is reflected that 3 is an important number; mainly because it represents the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I’ve grown up being taught about God’s 3 forms as being 3 in 1. It makes me wonder, if this was done purposely or by coincidence, since it seems to fit into that assumption.   

All in all, these scenes depict major changes in the world's history, as well as the Bible. Sin being introduced, and Sin being taken away. Big changes, both relating to sin. I doubt that was a coincidence. 

Week 8 Post #7

 Option #1

Option #1: Consider the Bust of Commodus as Hercules (c. 191-92 CE) and

the portrait head of Caracalla (c. 217-230) 

            I believe that both statues evoke a feeling of power, and status. however in the case of the Bust of Commodus as Hercules, he seems to be pushing that idea ahead further than the Portrait head of Caracalla, since Commodus is blatantly comparing his image to the god Hercules, and re-creating himself as the hero of so many tales in that era. I believe it would be comparable in modern times if Barack Obama were to fashion himself into the image of Jesus or even Buddha. He is trying so hard to have the people see him as a deity figure, that he'll replicate it in any way he can. Also, the story of Hercules is well known even to this day, as a hero as strong as a God; fighting his way back into the realm of the Gods. (Mount Olympus) However even if I am recalling the story of Hercules from the Disney movie, the point is the symbolism that he was going for when having his bust made in that form is obvious. Strong, courageous, smart, all in all a great ruler. Also this can be seen in the detailing of the lions skin draped over his head and tied around his shoulders, that he was a strong and wise warrior. In order to have concurred such a feared and revered creature of the area. The amount of detail in the curls of his hair and beard are incredible also. It seems to give him a more youthful and immortal feeling than if they had depicted him balding. Which would be too human and too similar to a common man to work to elevate the people's view's of his superiority.

            In the case of the Portrait head of Caracalla, we don't get as much visual triggers as we do in the first bust, since all that's left of it is the head. The face itself is interesting, its realistic, and is serious. Just the features on their own give the impression of unwavering strength and wisdom. He has very strong eyebrows as well as realistic creases from thinking or being threatening, but I sense no threatening substance from his glance. It seems to me as if both statues have a very wide range of audience, as I assume the story of Hercules was as well known in that era as it is in ours. As well as the Portrait, because it holds a certain tone through his expression that I believe can be read by many different people of many different ages. I like the fact that his hair is more realistic, as well as the fact that he has a light beard, would suggest a youthful first growth of hair. Or the merging into puberty but having the rest of the statue symbolize strength and wit. perhaps he was trying to have people see him as young and wise, to help strengthen the confidence of the people he was "advertising" to. Young yet wise, in order to rule Rome for a long time; yet well, so it wouldn't turn to tyranny.